A ‘Second Chance’ After 27 Years in Prison: How Criminal Justice Helped an Ex-Inmate Graduate
BALTIMORE — Maurice Smith stood anxious and alone, as the crowd of graduates around him hugged and chatted a few feet away. He was cloaked in the same black gown and donned the same black cap, but that was about all that he and the rest of Goucher College’s Class of 2019 had in common.
When they were 19, they were starting college. When he was 19, he was starting a prison sentence for murder that would last 27 years, one month and seven days — longer than his fellow graduates had been alive.
“There are many roads to this moment,” said Mr. Smith, 47, as he held up the cellphone he had recently learned to use and snapped a picture of himself against a backdrop of squares and tassels. “They took theirs. I took mine. But we’re all here.”
Mr. Smith’s journey from inmate to college graduate has been cheered on by a bipartisan and ideologically diverse coalition that has pressed the case for criminal justice. The path he took was quietly extended in the last year to thousands of other prisoners across the country. Mr. Smith was able to complete his bachelor’s degree through the Goucher Prison Education Partnership while serving at the Maryland Correctional Institution in Jessup, using federal Pell grants offered through a pilot program called Second Chance Pell.
Started in 2016, the program doled out $35.6 million to educate 8,800 incarcerated students at 40 institutions in its first two years, and is one of the only Obama-era education initiatives that has survived the Trump administration.
The White House has embraced the program as part of its criminal justice agenda, which aims to stymie mass incarceration and reduce recidivism. The Trump administration has pledged $28 million to extend the Second Chance Pell program through next year. Last month, in a commencement address to 70 incarcerated students at the Dick Conner Correctional Center in Oklahoma, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos announced that she was pushing for the initiative to be made permanent.
“President Donald Trump and I have faith in the power of redemption,” Ms. DeVos said.
The administration was brought to its embrace by a remarkable coalition of policy advocates — including far-right conservatives, religious groups and social justice advocates — that rarely find common cause. The libertarian billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch, the liberal Center for American Progress, the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans for Tax Reform and the Tea Party-oriented FreedomWorks have been working toward a broad overhaul of the criminal justice system for years.
With the recent passage of the First Step Act, a bipartisan sentencing bill that will lead to the release of thousands of low-level offenders, advocates see increasing prisoners’ access to higher education as the next logical step.
Under a ban tucked into the 1994 crime bill, prisoners were ineligible for Pell grants, the largest postsecondary federal aid program for low-income undergraduates, but the Second Chance initiative partly lifted that. The 1994 bill, signed by President Bill Clinton and championed by heavyweight Democrats like Joseph R. Biden Jr., a senator at the time, is roiling politics anew. It has thrown Mr. Biden on the defensive as he seeks the Democratic presidential nomination and given Mr. Trump an unlikely appeal to black voters.
But it was a Republican, Kay Bailey Hutchison, then a senator of Texas, who proposed broadening an existing restriction on Pell grants for prisoners serving life sentences or on death row to all prisoners, no matter their offenses. After the law was signed, a robust prison education system collapsed almost overnight.
Lawmakers are seeking ways to restore Pell eligibility for prisoners, including reversing the ban in a reauthorization of the Higher Education Act.
“This issue is ripe in American politics for two reasons,” said Gerard Robinson, the executive director of the Center for Advancing Opportunity, who has studied prison education. “The millennials see this as a civil rights issue for their generation,” he said, and older generations see it as recompense for “the role they played in the war on drugs dating back to the 1970s up through the crime bill.”
The Obama administration used its experimental authority to introduce Second Chance Pell in 2015 as a pilot that unlocked Pell grants for Mr. Smith and 12,000 other eligible inmates, allowing them to pursue college coursework. The Goucher Prison Education Partnership, which had operated since 2012 with private donations, was among 67 colleges chosen to participate. The program is still 75 percent privately funded.
“Earning a bachelor’s degree while incarcerated can be life-changing,” said Amy Roza, director of the Goucher prison partnership. “There is something remarkable about having an issue, in 2019, where people in the current White House, Congress, advocates with a variety of perspectives all believe in the value of this.”
Not everyone in Congress is on board.
“I’m not really sure where this push for Pell is coming from,” Representative Virginia Foxx of North Carolina, the ranking Republican on the House Education Committee, grumbled at a recent hearing.
Where it is coming from is self-evident to a spectrum of advocates and politicians. About 90 percent of the country’s two million prisoners will be released back into society. A report published in January by the Vera Institute of Justice found that expanding Pell grants to prisoners would result in higher earnings when they are released, and save states $365.8 million each year in incarceration costs.
An often-cited 2013 RAND Corporation study, commissioned by the Justice Department, found that prisoners who had access to education were 43 percent less likely to return to prison within three years than those who did not.
In fact, they might show an appreciation of the world of work that few others would find.
“I sit in rush hour traffic and say, Wow, I’m a part of this,” said Donte Small, the Goucher program’s first graduate to earn a bachelor’s degree from the college and who is working at a software development company. “I’m just loving the grind — everybody in their cars, everybody’s going home. You realize you’re a part of a community.”
When Maurice Smith was released from prison in March, he said completing his prison term and his degree were his first major feats.
He grew up in Harlem at the height of the crack cocaine era, and quickly racked up a juvenile record for drug possession. He was generally “unmotivated” in his education, he said, but surprised himself in high school by scoring second-highest on a state standardized test. His vice principal accused him of cheating off his girlfriend. “That didn’t help my attitude,” he said.
He earned a high school equivalency diploma at 18 while serving a six-month stint on Rikers Island.
A year later, in 1992, Mr. Smith shot and killed a man who was trying to rob a friend’s home in East Baltimore. At 19, he was sentenced to life with the possibility of parole.
“It’s hard to talk about second chances when my actions didn’t give an individual a second chance,” he said.
In 1993, he enrolled in college courses and made the dean’s list. The next year, the crime bill rescinded his Pell grant. He spent years after that bored and angry, in and out of solitary confinement. But then he began to knock years off his sentence through work and good conduct credits. Parole became plausible. “I could actually see that door, and I knew I had to make myself employable,” he said.
Mr. Smith began pursuing an American Studies degree at Goucher in 2013, taking courses like sociology and precalculus from 2 p.m. to 9 p.m. He would choose between sleep and studying before heading to the prison kitchen from midnight to 6 a.m.
One of his favorite pastimes was to read aloud “Of Mice and Men” with a classmate. He wrestled with Immanuel Kant’s theories on ethics versus John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism. He thought hard on a lesson on hegemonic masculinity.
Nina Kasniunas, a political scientist at Goucher, said Mr. Smith was the “typical ‘A’ student” — cerebral and deliberate, quiet but engaging. For her congressional politics course, she said, he was asked to propose legislation on reparations for the descendants of slaves. While others put forth big and fanciful ideas, Mr. Smith’s proposal was politically palatable and constitutionally sound: reparations through educational support.
Ms. Kasniunas said students like Mr. Smith made the pat downs, metal detectors, lack of technology and other constraints of teaching in the prison worth it.
“They reminded me of the power of what we do,” she said. “Nothing is taken for granted.”
Mr. Smith graduated with a 3.79 grade point average, left prison in April and currently works the graveyard shift at a warehouse at a Johnson & Johnson. A childhood friend, Kima Smith, reconnected with him in 2015, and they married in the Maryland prison in 2017.
“He’s the same person now that he’s always been,” she said. “When he sets his mind to something, he does it.”
In the 24 hours before graduation, exactly two months after his release, Mr. Smith walked through Goucher’s lush green campus and stone buildings for the first time. Until that day, his Goucher College had been a library with orange plastic circular tables and a few computers lining the walls.
“You know you’re representing something bigger, but I never imagined this,” he said, as he walked to pick up his cap and gown.
Mr. Smith was the student speaker for a small, intimate pre-commencement ceremony for Goucher partnership students, attended by President Barack Obama’s second education secretary, John King, and Mark Holden, a senior vice president at Koch Industries.
Mr. Smith said he went from an underachiever to wanting to pursue a master’s degree in sociology, vowing to press for education in the criminal justice system.
“My education could never be accurately valued by the pay I receive at my job,” he said. “There is infinitely more value in the way in which I now view the world.”
Mr. King, who delivered the keynote address, told the story of a correctional officer who had pulled Mr. Smith aside, leaving him wondering what he had done wrong. The officer then handed him a five-page college paper to proofread.
The next day at Goucher’s grand commencement, students laughed at one-liners from the speaker, Bill Nye the Science Guy, and inside jokes about a campus fox. Mr. Smith, stoic, processed the pomp and circumstance the way he had been conditioned as Inmate No. 227-777 — taking much in, emitting little.
It wasn’t until he stood in line awaiting his turn to cross the stage that his shoulders relaxed, a smile broadened across his face, and he finally felt a part of it all. He raised both hands above his head giving himself a round of applause and threw a fist, as the announcer called, “Maurice Smith, magna cum laude.”
Source: www.nytimes.com, written by Erica L. Green
Weed 101? New law could pave way for future college students to really major in marijuana
Some community colleges and four-year universities in Illinois are exploring the possibility of launching educational programs to train people in the business of growing and marketing marijuana in light of a new state law legalizing adult-use recreational marijuana.
There is, however, one significant hitch in that idea: such programs could run afoul of a federal law that still requires higher education institutions to maintain drug-free policies.
Setting up educational training programs through public community colleges is just one part of the 610-page Cannabis Regulation and Tax Act, which Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed into law June 25. It provides the state Department of Agriculture can issue licenses to as many as eight community colleges to take part in a Cannabis Vocational Training Pilot Program.
Under that program, participating colleges could offer a Career in Cannabis Certificate that would be obtained by taking courses that “allow participating students to work with, study, and grow live cannabis plants so as to prepare students for a career in the legal cannabis industry, and to instruct participating students on the best business practices, professional responsibility, and legal compliance of the cannabis industry.”
Matt Berry, a spokesman for the Illinois Community College Board, said in an email no decisions have been made about any colleges taking part in the program.
“Certainly (there) has been a general level of interest expressed by some colleges, but until the rules are adopted and details emerge, everything is very preliminary,” he said. “The ICCB and the colleges are also still evaluating and studying what impact, if any, the decision to offer this certificate would have on the institution in terms of federal regulations and accreditation.”
Although marijuana will become legal under state law starting Jan. 1, it is still considered an illegal narcotic under federal law.
For colleges and universities, the specific federal statute at issue is the Drug Free Schools and Campuses Regulations. It requires all colleges and universities receiving federal funding to establish policies to “clearly prohibit, at a minimum, the unlawful possession, use, or distribution of illicit drugs and alcohol by students and employees on its property or as part of any of its activities.”
Institutions that fail to comply with that law risk losing access to all federal funding, including access to federal student financial aid.
Even before the Pritzker signed the Illinois legalization law, a few institutions in Illinois had already started gearing up to launch cannabis-related educational programs.
Southern Illinois University, for example, announced in October it was launching a program stretching across several departments to expand research on cannabis production, but the program has been limited to industrial hemp, now legal under both state and federal law. SIU said additional federal legislation would be needed before it could begin researching marijuana production.
And Oakton Community College announced in March that it authorized a program allowing students to obtain “cannabis dispensary and patient care specialist” certificates. While the college’s board of trustees approved that program, it is still awaiting final approval from the Illinois Community Colleges Board.
State Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago, was lead sponsor of the marijuana legalization bill in the House. She said in a phone interview that the idea of offering certificate programs through community colleges came from Pritzker’s administration.
“The law creates an opportunity for community colleges to create new programs for students to participate in the growing new cannabis industry,” said Jordan Abudayyeh, a spokeswoman for Pritzker. “Decisions about whether to offer this program are made on the local level, with feedback from their constituents and advice from their legal counsel.”
Meanwhile, officials at the Medical Cannabis Alliance of Illinois, a trade association representing cultivation centers and dispensary organizations, have approached community colleges to offer advice on how schools can offer programs while remaining federally compliant. One suggestion is keeping the actual production of marijuana plants off campus.
“We’re offering an opportunity to have an internship, or even a couple of hours actually in the site, so [students] can see how the entire process works,” said Pam Althoff, a former Republican state senator from McHenry who is now the alliance’s executive director.
“It’s part of trying to establish social equity programs and mentorship,” she added. “So at this point it’s all an investigation as to ‘can we do this; does it work.’ And if they choose not to use cannabis on site, we can certainly offer them, potentially, access to our sites as part of a program, and then they’d actually see the true plant.”
Source: Via Chicago Sun Times, written by Peter Hancock — Capitol News Illinois
The Health Benefits of Cannabis
Over the years, we have seen a drastic rise in the use of cannabis. Whether the general population is smoking or ingesting it, most of us can agree that it is no surprise cannabis, ultimately, became legal as of 2017 in the UK, before it was passed in 2018 in California. Whatever the case may be, studies have shown multiple results in exactly why people who smoke or intake, use cannabis. Regardless of the so-called bad reputation in which cannabis has developed over the years, we can admit that studies and scientists have proved its benefits to both an individual’s life and society.
According to a 2018 Business Insider article entitled, “25 Benefits of Marijuana,” there have been both medical and non-medical reasons why people use it. Some examples are for back pain, chronic pain, controlling epileptic seizures, and decreasing seizures and the risk of Alzheimer’s and bowel disease. It is straightforward too because people also simply enjoy smoking or ingesting cannabis for “fun.” Sides effects have been prone to show more positive results than someone who drinks an excessive amount. Unlike alcohol, smoking or ingesting cannabis shows an increase in appetite, mood, and often productivity where multiple users claim that weed helps them start and complete goals and day-to-day tasks.
Other studies have also shown the perks that cannabis has on one’s mental health. Although the comparison between mental health and cannabis is a controversial one, it is something that should not be fret over.
According to multiple sources and studies such as Research Weekly, claims are, yes, proven that if one does intake an overload of amount of cannabis, then there are the possible side effects of psychosis episodes. However, like everything else in the world from hobbies to what we eat and drink, overuse and excessive intake will inevitably make the body react. In the end, it is also the cannabis users’ responsibility to monitor how much they smoke and intake, especially on a day-to-day basis.
Furthermore, using cannabis has shown a decrease in one’s anxiety and depression, where individuals are said to feel ‘happier’ or more ‘relaxed’ after their usage. Another interesting factor is that cannabis has also shown results of protecting any head trauma that an athlete might have suffered, especially in rough sports such as football, boxing, and baseball.
Lastly, cannabis will forever have an ongoing debate if it is ‘good’ or ‘bad.’ One aspect we can admit is that cannabis has yet to show any severe or deadly factors, including death itself when used. Cannabis is a freedom of choice; there is no so-called right or wrong answer for using it because it DOES have a less chance of impairing someone at the wheel--unlike drinking or doing drugs--to also not getting in one’s ‘way’ from living their life and going through their daily routine.
If anything, individuals just need to bear in mind when using cannabis - be certain to do so for your own sake and not the pressures by anyone, including society itself. Until then, cannabis is the way!
I am the sober CEO of a Cannabis Company: I don’t get high on my own supply